Tools
Cheatsheets
Interview problems
Blog

YAML to JSON converter

FAQ

YAML vs JSON for configuration files

YAML (YAML Ain't Markup Language) and JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) are both commonly used for configuration files.

YAML is generally considered to be more human-readable, since it uses indentation to indicate nested elements, while JSON uses curly braces. This makes YAML more suitable for configuration files that will be edited by hand, while JSON may be more suitable for machine-generated configuration files.

However, JSON has wider support and is more widely used across different programming languages and systems. JSON is also a subset of JavaScript, so it can be used directly in JavaScript without any additional parsing or conversion.

In summary, YAML is more human-readable and JSON is more widely used across languages and systems.

Which systems commonly use yaml for configuration files?

YAML is commonly used as a configuration file format in several systems and frameworks, including:

Kubernetes: Kubernetes uses YAML to define the configuration of containerized applications and services
Ansible: Ansible, an IT automation tool, uses YAML to define playbooks and roles that specify the tasks to be executed on remote servers.
Docker: Docker Compose, a tool for defining and running multi-container Docker applications, uses YAML to define the configuration of the services in the application.
Chef: Chef, a configuration management tool, uses YAML to define attributes and recipes that specify the configuration of servers.
SaltStack: SaltStack, another configuration management tool, uses YAML to define states that specify the desired configuration of servers.

Many other cloud providers and deployment tools use YAML as configuration file format.
Additionally, YAML is also used in many other scenarios, such as build configurations, continuous integration, and other deployment-related tasks.

FAQContact UsChangelog